<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Reasons to Doubt Global Warming is Man-Made (Part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/</link>
	<description>Conservatism isn&#039;t about party, its a philosophy that both parties failed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rochester_veteran</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9067</link>
		<dc:creator>rochester_veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 00:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-9067</guid>
		<description>horrace,

I&#039;ll write this as respectfully as possible, only God is always correct.

Human induced global warming is a hoax, meant to scare people into a global, socialist system.

The United States is the best at looking after the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>horrace,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll write this as respectfully as possible, only God is always correct.</p>
<p>Human induced global warming is a hoax, meant to scare people into a global, socialist system.</p>
<p>The United States is the best at looking after the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: horrace willett-powell</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-9066</link>
		<dc:creator>horrace willett-powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-9066</guid>
		<description>i am horrace and i am always correct, i believe that global warming is not a hoax and even if it was we should still look after the planet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am horrace and i am always correct, i believe that global warming is not a hoax and even if it was we should still look after the planet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phantomlord</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 07:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-207</guid>
		<description>About glaciers melting... If a glacier sits, floating entirely in water (the north pole), melting doesn&#039;t raise the sea level at all. Try this experiment at home kids...

Get a clear plastic cup and put an ice cube in it. Fill it with enough water that the ice cube is floating freely. Get out your sharpie and mark a line where the water level is. Wait for the ice to melt. Tada! It&#039;s at the same level.

Only ice sitting on top of land (the south pole) melting will result in a change of the sea levels.

The biggest threat to global warming would be if Al Gore melted though. He obviously exists on land and is so cold and dense that if he were to melt, it would spell certain disaster for the industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About glaciers melting&#8230; If a glacier sits, floating entirely in water (the north pole), melting doesn&#8217;t raise the sea level at all. Try this experiment at home kids&#8230;</p>
<p>Get a clear plastic cup and put an ice cube in it. Fill it with enough water that the ice cube is floating freely. Get out your sharpie and mark a line where the water level is. Wait for the ice to melt. Tada! It&#8217;s at the same level.</p>
<p>Only ice sitting on top of land (the south pole) melting will result in a change of the sea levels.</p>
<p>The biggest threat to global warming would be if Al Gore melted though. He obviously exists on land and is so cold and dense that if he were to melt, it would spell certain disaster for the industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. Dr. Tommy Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Dr. Tommy Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-206</guid>
		<description>I am sure if the glaciers melt we have enough canyons in the world to absord the water.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am sure if the glaciers melt we have enough canyons in the world to absord the water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rochester_veteran</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>rochester_veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-205</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made the same &quot;earth closer, further&quot; point as a joke in the Forum before, but I have to tip my hat to article author, Duane Lester , on the following statement from this article:

&lt;i&gt;It might just be the sun that is making us warmer. I know that sounds a little crazy, that a ball of fire, “which by itself accounts for about 99.8% of the solar system’s mass,” could have such a profound impact on the temperature&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry for being crude, but, no shit sherlock! :-)  Duane Lester showed more common sense in that above statement than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made the same &#8220;earth closer, further&#8221; point as a joke in the Forum before, but I have to tip my hat to article author, Duane Lester , on the following statement from this article:</p>
<p><i>It might just be the sun that is making us warmer. I know that sounds a little crazy, that a ball of fire, “which by itself accounts for about 99.8% of the solar system’s mass,” could have such a profound impact on the temperature</i></p>
<p>Sorry for being crude, but, no shit sherlock! <img src='http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   Duane Lester showed more common sense in that above statement than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phantomlord</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-204</guid>
		<description>To clarify that a bit, if I&#039;m remembering my high school earth science correctly...

We&#039;re closest to the sun when it&#039;s winter in the northern hemisphere and farthest from the sun when it&#039;s summer in the northern hemisphere. It&#039;s the exact opposite in the southern hemisphere. It&#039;s all about how long the days are based on your latitude.

That said, we should receive more total radiation when we&#039;re closest to the sun.

Also, on those climate records from the 1800s, we didn&#039;t have nearly the precision in measurement tools back then as we do today. Laser thermometers accurate to thousands of a degree weren&#039;t even a futuristic vision. Most thermometers were precise to a few degrees instead (kinda like doing a front end alignment via the old string way versus the modern computerized system). Now they want to use those measurements to calculate how many tenths of a degree the temperature has changed in the last 100 years. GIGO. You calculations are only as precise as your least precise measurement. I guess that&#039;s just another day of science class most AGWers missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify that a bit, if I&#8217;m remembering my high school earth science correctly&#8230;</p>
<p>We&#8217;re closest to the sun when it&#8217;s winter in the northern hemisphere and farthest from the sun when it&#8217;s summer in the northern hemisphere. It&#8217;s the exact opposite in the southern hemisphere. It&#8217;s all about how long the days are based on your latitude.</p>
<p>That said, we should receive more total radiation when we&#8217;re closest to the sun.</p>
<p>Also, on those climate records from the 1800s, we didn&#8217;t have nearly the precision in measurement tools back then as we do today. Laser thermometers accurate to thousands of a degree weren&#8217;t even a futuristic vision. Most thermometers were precise to a few degrees instead (kinda like doing a front end alignment via the old string way versus the modern computerized system). Now they want to use those measurements to calculate how many tenths of a degree the temperature has changed in the last 100 years. GIGO. You calculations are only as precise as your least precise measurement. I guess that&#8217;s just another day of science class most AGWers missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rochester_veteran</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>rochester_veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-203</guid>
		<description>phantomlord,

I was in Air Weather Service for 4 years and we sometimes had a hard time hitting our criteria for a 4 hour aviation forecast. Written climatological records go back to the 1850&#039;s or so. There&#039;s not enough hard data to suggest that we&#039;re in anything else but a climate fluctuation that occurs naturally.

My theory is, it&#039;s a known fact that the Earth is on an eliptical orbit around the Sun. When the Earth is closer to the Sun, it&#039;s warmer. When the Earth is further away from the Sun, it&#039;s colder. (where&#039;s the guy from the Guiness commercial when I need him? Brilliant!)

Mankind still cannot control the weather! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phantomlord,</p>
<p>I was in Air Weather Service for 4 years and we sometimes had a hard time hitting our criteria for a 4 hour aviation forecast. Written climatological records go back to the 1850&#8242;s or so. There&#8217;s not enough hard data to suggest that we&#8217;re in anything else but a climate fluctuation that occurs naturally.</p>
<p>My theory is, it&#8217;s a known fact that the Earth is on an eliptical orbit around the Sun. When the Earth is closer to the Sun, it&#8217;s warmer. When the Earth is further away from the Sun, it&#8217;s colder. (where&#8217;s the guy from the Guiness commercial when I need him? Brilliant!)</p>
<p>Mankind still cannot control the weather! <img src='http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phantomlord</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/10-reasons-to-doubt-global-warming-is-man-made-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>phantomlord</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=86#comment-202</guid>
		<description>Duh, Mars is getting warmer because we&#039;re driving our SUVs there. Mars was perfectly fine until we started planting our solar powered robots on its surface.

And when they say &quot;this is the warmest year in 500 years,&quot; well, first of all, what SUVs were they riding around back then? I heard a lot about horses. I heard a lot about agrarian feudal societies that the GWers would like to see us return to (even though it &quot;peaked&quot; global warming to a higher activity than we&#039;re seeing now (warmest in 500 years means that it was warmer 500 years ago)), but not fleets of Hummers crossing the plains to do battle.

There&#039;s a LOT of bad science, assumptions and extrapolations involved in this entire field of science. In fact, the process of science is proving that you know the way something works by performing repeatable tests under controlled conditions. Can anyone point me to the backup earth they use as a control (versus the flawed, imaginary models) to validate their theories?

Besides, if it&#039;s getting too warm now, what exactly is the perfect temperature? Should we dial the thermostat back to when Rochester being covered by a glacier?

I&#039;ll believe in AGW when someone can propose a model, run it without changing any variables or formulas and it accurately predicts the climate 20 years out. I&#039;m perfectly fine if it takes 30 years to actually run the full simulation, if it can predict that far out without tweaking along the way to make it fit a curve of how the scientists want it to come out (as all current models do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, Mars is getting warmer because we&#8217;re driving our SUVs there. Mars was perfectly fine until we started planting our solar powered robots on its surface.</p>
<p>And when they say &#8220;this is the warmest year in 500 years,&#8221; well, first of all, what SUVs were they riding around back then? I heard a lot about horses. I heard a lot about agrarian feudal societies that the GWers would like to see us return to (even though it &#8220;peaked&#8221; global warming to a higher activity than we&#8217;re seeing now (warmest in 500 years means that it was warmer 500 years ago)), but not fleets of Hummers crossing the plains to do battle.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a LOT of bad science, assumptions and extrapolations involved in this entire field of science. In fact, the process of science is proving that you know the way something works by performing repeatable tests under controlled conditions. Can anyone point me to the backup earth they use as a control (versus the flawed, imaginary models) to validate their theories?</p>
<p>Besides, if it&#8217;s getting too warm now, what exactly is the perfect temperature? Should we dial the thermostat back to when Rochester being covered by a glacier?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll believe in AGW when someone can propose a model, run it without changing any variables or formulas and it accurately predicts the climate 20 years out. I&#8217;m perfectly fine if it takes 30 years to actually run the full simulation, if it can predict that far out without tweaking along the way to make it fit a curve of how the scientists want it to come out (as all current models do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

