<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maximum Achievable Damage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/maximum-achievable-damage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/maximum-achievable-damage/</link>
	<description>Conservatism isn&#039;t about party, its a philosophy that both parties failed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: howardroarke</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/maximum-achievable-damage/comment-page-1/#comment-10018</link>
		<dc:creator>howardroarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=3734#comment-10018</guid>
		<description>One provision of the Senate version requires insurers to offer coverage for &quot;children&quot; of recipients up through age 26. NJ already requires it up through age 31(!), and I think in NY it&#039;s either 26 or 30 (can&#039; t remember).

Entitlements beget more entitlements, which then beget more entitlements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One provision of the Senate version requires insurers to offer coverage for &#8220;children&#8221; of recipients up through age 26. NJ already requires it up through age 31(!), and I think in NY it&#8217;s either 26 or 30 (can&#8217; t remember).</p>
<p>Entitlements beget more entitlements, which then beget more entitlements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

