<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sotomayor&#8217;s Supreme Charade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/sotomayors-supreme-charade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/sotomayors-supreme-charade/</link>
	<description>Conservatism isn&#039;t about party, its a philosophy that both parties failed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 19:27:18 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HowardRoarke</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/sotomayors-supreme-charade/comment-page-1/#comment-9599</link>
		<dc:creator>HowardRoarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=2757#comment-9599</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rhetorical flourish&quot; is how  she described her oft-repeated comments. 

Yeah. Right.

They have to attack her views on international law, as well as other eyebrow-raising views she holds dear. 

Her comment on the 2nd Amendment was telling. When asked by Graham on her views about the 2nd Amendment, she used the oft-repeated meme of &quot;many Americans....&quot;. Yeah, Sonia, all of us unwashed masses whose 2nd Amendment rights are protected, unlike New Joke City where handguns have been banned since 1912, EXCEPT for the famous, the well-connected, the rich, the politicians, the Rosie O&#039;Donnel&#039;s (sp?) of the world.

Sonia Sotomayor is quite possible one of the worst nominations ever for the Supreme Court. She&#039;s another one of these elitist &quot;Good enough for me, but not for thee&quot;, types. 

They should also hammer her on her financial history, and her &quot;I buy presents for 40 people at Christmas&quot;, comment. With her irresponsibility re: her financial matters, coupled with her Left Wing views and kooks she counts as friends,  I shudder to think how she would vote/rule/decide on cases involving the current financial meltdown, to include cases which are sure to come up re: loans for minorities and all manner of high-risk mortgage schemes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rhetorical flourish&#8221; is how  she described her oft-repeated comments. </p>
<p>Yeah. Right.</p>
<p>They have to attack her views on international law, as well as other eyebrow-raising views she holds dear. </p>
<p>Her comment on the 2nd Amendment was telling. When asked by Graham on her views about the 2nd Amendment, she used the oft-repeated meme of &#8220;many Americans&#8230;.&#8221;. Yeah, Sonia, all of us unwashed masses whose 2nd Amendment rights are protected, unlike New Joke City where handguns have been banned since 1912, EXCEPT for the famous, the well-connected, the rich, the politicians, the Rosie O&#8217;Donnel&#8217;s (sp?) of the world.</p>
<p>Sonia Sotomayor is quite possible one of the worst nominations ever for the Supreme Court. She&#8217;s another one of these elitist &#8220;Good enough for me, but not for thee&#8221;, types. </p>
<p>They should also hammer her on her financial history, and her &#8220;I buy presents for 40 people at Christmas&#8221;, comment. With her irresponsibility re: her financial matters, coupled with her Left Wing views and kooks she counts as friends,  I shudder to think how she would vote/rule/decide on cases involving the current financial meltdown, to include cases which are sure to come up re: loans for minorities and all manner of high-risk mortgage schemes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
