<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yes, We Can</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/yes-we-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/yes-we-can/</link>
	<description>Conservatism isn&#039;t about party, its a philosophy that both parties failed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 19:04:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Barham</title>
		<link>http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/yes-we-can/comment-page-1/#comment-9900</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:05:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rochesterconservative.com/blog/?p=3420#comment-9900</guid>
		<description>Are the Blue Dogs pining for the good old days of 19th century Democrats who saw Jefferson and Jackson as more influential than Rousseau and Marx, as cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS on Amazon and www.claysamerica.com, or just waiting for a better cash deal from Obama?  Would be nice if more would stand up for individual freedom instead of the supremacy of community and its elite few rulers.  Hats off to Hoffman who may help define a better way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the Blue Dogs pining for the good old days of 19th century Democrats who saw Jefferson and Jackson as more influential than Rousseau and Marx, as cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS on Amazon and <a href="http://www.claysamerica.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.claysamerica.com</a>, or just waiting for a better cash deal from Obama?  Would be nice if more would stand up for individual freedom instead of the supremacy of community and its elite few rulers.  Hats off to Hoffman who may help define a better way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

